Can an agent replace Ironclad?

I want to downgrade Ironclad. It currently does: Contract lifecycle management for legal teams: workflows for creating contracts, AI review, and a repository of everything you signed. Take over this work: - Contract administration — YES. Yes. Tracking what you signed, when it renews, what it obliges you to do and when notice is due is pure record-keeping — and it is the administration failure that quietly costs businesses the most money. - Contract review — HALF. Half. An agent reads a contract faster than you and reliably extracts the terms, deadlines and deviations from your standard. What it cannot do is tell you which risk actually matters given what you know about the other side. - Negotiation — NOT YET. No. An agent can prepare a negotiation extremely well — positions, precedents, walkaway numbers, likely objections. It cannot conduct one, because negotiation runs on leverage, relationship and the ability to be believed when you say no. - Document processing — YES. Yes. Reading, classifying, extracting, filing and acting on documents is one of the strongest agent capabilities. It handles the messy real-world paperwork that defeated a decade of OCR products. Do not take over: - The signed-contract repository and obligation dates - Approval workflows sales and finance already follow These stay with me across all of it: - Renewal decisions - Negotiation - Signing - Risk decisions - Anything above your materiality threshold - The conversation itself - Every concession - Reading whether their constraint is real or performed - The relationship afterwards - Legal interpretation - Approving anything with a cost - Deciding retention and deletion Before we start, tell me: which of these you cannot do with the access I can actually give you, and what would break if this ran unattended for a month. — brief built at cananagentdo.com/ironclad