Can an agent replace Fullstory?

I want to cut the work inside Fullstory. It currently does: Enterprise session replay and behavioural analytics: every session captured, indexed and searchable, with frustration signals detected automatically. Take over this work: - Data analysis — MOSTLY. Mostly. An agent cleans, queries, models and visualises quickly and competently. The risk is not that it computes wrongly — it is that it answers the question you asked rather than the one you meant. - Customer research — MOSTLY. Mostly, for analysing what customers have already said. An agent reads every ticket, review, call transcript and survey response and finds the patterns nobody has time to look for. It cannot conduct the interview. - QA testing — YES. Yes. Writing tests, running regression suites, driving the browser and reporting reproducible failures is dependable agent work, and it removes the manual regression pass that everyone hates and eventually skips. - Bug triage — YES. Yes. Reading a bug report, reproducing it, finding the likely cause, checking for duplicates and routing it to the right team is exactly the work that clogs engineering queues — and an agent does it in minutes. Do not take over: - The session archive itself - Capture infrastructure inside your product - Searchable evidence when support or engineering disputes what happened These stay with me across all of it: - Framing the question - Knowing the data’s history - Deciding what to do about the answer - The interviews - Judging what people mean versus what they said - Deciding what to act on - The release decision - Judging severity against business risk - Usability judgement - Declaring incidents - Prioritising against the roadmap - Customer communication Before we start, tell me: which of these you cannot do with the access I can actually give you, and what would break if this ran unattended for a month. — brief built at cananagentdo.com/fullstory